Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: CA 2005
Four years earlier, Computer Associates' new CEO Sanjay Kumar spoke of a new mission, a new business model, a new attitude ("focused, focused, focused" said the ads) and thus, a new "CA" logo. Things looked better for CA, but they went worse, and in 2004 Kumar and four colleagues were indicted for diddling the books. But the business fundamentals, though soft, were firming up. An almost entirely new leadership team, led by IBM veteran John Swainson, set out to transform the company. There was every reason to say 'forget last year, focus on the future; once again, this is a new CA' from which it is a short leap to 'so let's change the logo again.' But according to CMO Don Friedman, "changing the brandmark was the last thing we thought about. First, we had to transform our internal understanding of the business we're in. And it isn't about computers any more. It's about a huge new need, far more holistic, for enterprise-wide IT management." This significantly broadened the 2001 focus (on eBusiness software). But to sell this idea, the new team concluded, it would indeed help to change the brandmark "and the 70s name as well." Per Friedman, "'Computer' no longer says anything more than 'hardware'." It had to go, primarily because it narrowed and undermined the "EITM" (Enterprise IT Management) positioning goal. "We considered but quickly ruled out creating a new name," says Friedman; "but everybody calls us CA, which works fine. Even in California and Canada, context usually takes care of identifying us." A legal name change followed. And the design strategy? Why change the logo? It's considered an evolutionary change, not revolutionary, and was done partly for the sake of change (and that's appropriate). But it also signals changes in both strategy, and personality. Friedman says that by bringing the C and the A closer together "to symbolize unification and simplification, the new logo expresses our Enterprise strategy -- to unify and simplify IT management." The personality is simply more straightforward. It was hard to connect the 2001 'focus' story to the new 'unify/simplify' story. (Friedman adds that he never understood why the 'a' was the focus of the 2001 logo.) Tony Spaeth
CREDITS Sequel Studio, NY CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 13/02/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 90% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Abbreviations |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Abbreviations |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 50% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Abbreviations |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Functional driver: 10% | |||
Name weakness Increase name impact & recall | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Abbreviations |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||