Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
2002 old logo For decades, American Home Products (AHP) was the biggest unknown company in America, and a great frustration to identity consultants: William LaPorte, its legendary leader in the 50s -70s and successor John Stafford firmly denied the relevance of a corporate brand, and AHP, comfortable as a self-described (but very hands-on) holding company, enjoyed the quiet reputation of a 'widows and orphans' stock.' But by the mid 80s, its food and saucepan businesses were gone and AHP was becoming a pure play drug company. To his credit, new CEO Robert Essner knew that success, as a freestanding pharmaceutical leader, would require a stronger and more clearly focused corporate brand. He chose 'Wyeth,' the name of a subsidiary acquired in 1926 and added the descriptor "Pharmaceuticals." "We thought about a coined name but decided we already have good equity in a name we already have," he said (in a NYTimes interview). "This is a name that 80 percent of our employees already have on their business card." Three Divisions were expressed (Pharmaceuticals, Consumer Health Care and Animal Health) and although the Fort Dodge name was retained for Animal Health, the new Wyeth logo (an unadorned typographic wordmark) would visually brand them all. CREDITS Landor CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 13/02/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 100% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Narrow the scope Express a more specific focus | 40% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Brand |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||