Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Belgacom 2003
2003 1992 "Belgacom is all too frequently still seen as a company which is too bureaucratic, distant and focused on traditional telecommunications activities." said CEO John Goossens on the 10th anniversary of the former monopolist state-owned company RTT (Belgian Telegraph & Telephone company). He would use a large-scale change project to give the telecom company a strong and more modern image, and revitalize its internal culture. The new logo, with the sunburst behind the O, expresses the brand promise - “Brand New Day” - developed by Landor and Belgacom to position the company as bright and optimistic and to help cultivate internal change. In order to align daily employee behaviour with the new brand values, the company organized an individual training day for each of the 19,000 employees. Tom Vanderbauwhede CREDITS Landor CASE INFO Submitted by: Tom Vanderbauwhede, 11/03/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 80% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Functional driver: 20% | |||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||