Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Reliance ADAG 2006
This is a spinout, and a story of biblical proportions. The legendary Dhirubai Ambani, who died in 2002, was said to be the world's greatest businessman. Starting with textiles, he built India's premiere corporation (sales of $23 billion), with leadership positions in energy, communications, finance and more, all under the Reliance brand. And with his wife and partner Kokilaben, he raised two sons, Mukesh and the younger Anil, to share and inherit his leadership. Instead, they waged a bitter and public war for power. Ultimately their mother helped broker a peace of sorts. Reliance Group would be divided. Mukesh would continue to lead Reliance Group and its $16 billion Reliance Industries -- the core oil, chemicals and textile businesses. But companies in four sectors (coal-based energy, gas-based energy, financial services and communications) would be "demerged" to Anil. Neither brother, however, would concede the Reliance name and logo. So they glossed this over, agreeing that in existing businesses they would share the name, while in new categories whoever got there first could own it. (One imagines that both brothers are now furiously starting little ventures in every imaginable category, to stake their claim.) The ball was in Anil's court, however, to express a new presence. Reliance retained Prophet to develop a new brand positioning, and Landor Associates to develop a new visual identity system. According to Landor director Bill Larsen, "the client considered a variety of preliminary naming ideas such as 'Reliance1,' but decided on Reliance ADAG, thus leveraging the power of Anil Ambani, while also retaining the full heritage and equity of the Reliance name. Landor was then challenged to express this new dynamic, confident and contemporary Reliance ADAG, in a simple and bold manner in order to stand out within the Indian landscape. " You see the solution, a lock-up (for now at least) of Reliance with the rest of the company name, with Reliance featuring lower-case e's and especially a central AA device, "the Reliance Apex." At launch, Mr. Ambani explained blue and red as the colors of integrity, confidence, energy and passion, and the lower-case characters as signals of accessibility and openness. But that sounds like PR-speak. The identity's more fundamental role is "to integrate the multitude of businesses under one work culture" and its intended message is "a change in the way we relate to ourselves, to the world, and to one another... not as individuals with limited roles and responsibilities, but as members of one team, one family, one collectivity." Tony Spaeth CREDITS Landor UK CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 13/11/2006 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 30% | |||
Spinout or de-acquisition Preserve existing equity | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Ownership | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Management | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: History | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Strategic driver: 40% | |||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 15% | x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic |
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change perceived composition Redefine the defining units | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Competence list | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Functional driver: 30% | |||
Name confusion Increase name differentiation | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||