Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Lucent Technologies 1996
In 1995, AT&T dedided to split in three, by spinning out its computer business (to be renamed NCR), and all of its telecommunications manufacturing businesses, whose potential customers included all of AT&T's competitors in telecom services. This new company, whose $22 billion IPO would be the largest yet in history, needed a new name. Rebranding, in fact, was an immediate and urgent priority for the new management team of Henry Schacte, Richard McGinn and Carly Fiorina. Landor was retained for its global network, big-client experience and speed commitment. Barred from using the Bell and AT&T brands, management opted for a "clean break" strategy, an expression of freedom and self-determination. The branding goals: retain "quality, reliability, technological innovation and stature," add "speed, energy, flexibility," but lose "slow, arrogant, inflexible." The name "Lucent," an evocative real word meaning light-bearing, and the abstract red "ring of innovation" symbol met these strategic and and emotional goals in dramatic fashion. Two descriptive tag lines were used, to retain historic equity and define the new scope of the enterprise -- "Bell Labs Innovations," and "We make the things that make communications work." A formal name extension, "Technologies," provided another way to communicate core competence. Five units were defined and named, and a monolithic signature system would help assure that all employees would help to build the new brand. The employee launch was a live global internal video conference from HQ, supported then by a sustained $80 million ad campaign. CREDITS Landor CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 8/04/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 50% | |||
Spinout or de-acquisition Preserve existing equity | 5% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: History | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Spinout or de-acquisition Express a new vision | 45% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Borrowed words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Strategic driver: 50% | |||
Change direction Redefine industry or core competence | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Borrowed words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Borrowed words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Name change: Borrowed words |
x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||