Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Harlan Laboratories 2008
2008 old logo Harlan is a global provider of research models and contract research services. Control of the family-owned Harlan Sprague Dawley was acquired by investors Genstar Capital in 2005. To grow the business, Genstar recruited lab-industry leader Steve Sullivan from competitor Covance. Recognizing that (without modification) the traditional Harlan brand was a barrier to unity and might inhibit recognition of the company's growing strengths, Sullivan retained Tony Spaeth for a corporate brand review. Provision of research models (lab animals) is Harlan's core, to which acquisitions in contract research services have been added — SafePharm in the U.K. and RCC in Switzerland — bringing Harlan further downstream in a fuller spectrum of drug development and toxicology sciences. The rebranding challenge: Retain the Harlan equity but communicate "new company, new leadership," with a commitment more broadly to scientific excellence — a company transformed by the integration of its research-driven acquisitions. As Sullivan summed it up, "We are coming together under a single banner worldwide, with one vision, one set of values and a company-wide passion for scientific excellence." CREDITS Tony Spaeth, identity consultant CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 18/11/2008 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 90% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Enhance size perception | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Change perceived composition Redefine the defining units | 5% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Functional driver: 10% | |||
Name weakness Increase name impact & recall | 5% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names |
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||