Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Devon Energy 2007
2008 old logo This is a common story... the company you never heard of because it saw no need to be known, and was perfectly happy flying under the radar. It had a logo, to be sure, probably because its first annual report looked better with one. Nothing especially wrong with it, except that it was more appropriate for a bar of soap than an oil and gas company. But success, exponential growth and a ton of acquisitions made "under the radar" an untenable branding strategy. Devon is now one of the world's leading independent energy companies, an important presence in its Oklahoma City home community and in global policy and finance communities. Its employees and its leaders wanted it better known, respected for their achievements and for Devon's new importance. Fortune 500 in 2002, NYSE listing in 2004 -- the time had come to look like a leader. An even more important driver was expressed by the internal slogan "27 to 1." In the twenty-seven companies Devon had acquired, many employees still related to their old brands, most of which were more appropriate (and possibly better-designed) than the "Devon" that now ruled them. To build one proud and coherent team, Devon would need a better flag to salute. Landor was retained, and provided a straightforward wordmark-based design solution that capitalizes on the simple, distinctive Devon name, incorporating a three-bars graphic device for visual impact and (by evoking geological strata) conceptual relevance. The bars also provide forms for a dynamic visual system, clearly evident in the www.devonenergy.com home page. The new tag, "Commitment runs deep," is primarily internally directed, as was the low-key launch event, appended to a quarterly employee 'town hall' meeting. We were told that the new advertising campaign, which builds on this 'commitment' message, was actually directed at employees "with the public listening in." Several months later, when management was more confident with their new look and greater visibility, advertising was extended to broader audiences. Sidebar: CEO Larry Nichols was hosting a meeting with analysts in the HQ boardroom when a crane lowered the old Devon logo past the window. Their natural question... "Is there something you haven't told us?" drew a response something like "No, I was just tired of the old one." CREDITS Counsel and design: Landor (SF) CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 20/03/2008 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 90% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Functional driver: 10% | |||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Wordmark-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||