Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Outward Bound USA 2005
2005 old logo In 2003, Tony Spaeth met Greg Farrell, President of an education reform initiative called Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound, and agreed to help Greg address his identity problems. The name was cumbersome (and "ELOB" didn't help). More importantly its incorporation of the parent name, Outward Bound, was a mixed blessing. The positives (awareness, authority, cultural values) were great, but its wilderness association ("kids in the woods") is misleading. Expeditionary Learning deals with kids in their classrooms. It is in the school reform business, applying to the classroom environment and curriculum what has been learned in the woods about learning and personal growth via "expeditions." The "ELOB" issues couldn't be solved however, without addressing the parent's own branding problems, including its low-visibility wordmark-in symbol, and the symbol's Victorian personality. Today's Outward Bound needs to be known as the educational force it is becoming in America's urban environments, corporate offices and schoolrooms, not just in the wilderness. The Compass Rose symbol (which will be retained as a seal of authenticity) was a handicap both in its technically weak branding impact, and as a barrier to change. John Read, the new leader of Outward Bound USA, quickly recognized the opportunities an identity change could offer. As it happens, he was working to transform the organization by consolidating the seven autonomous 'schools' that made up Outward Bound USA into one stronger entity. In early 2005, five of the seven voted to consolidate. (The New York City and North Carolina units would continue, for the time being, under charters.) Designer Nat Connacher joined the team. We separated the words Outward Bound from their compass rose symbol, so the words (the strongest brand asset) could be bigger, and so a simplified compass symbol could be used to anchor a more flexible signature system. "Outward Bound Wilderness" could now identify itself as one of several Outward Bound programs. And "Expeditionary Learning Schools" could free itself of the misleading overbranding, while keeping the visual association and a more proportionate verbal association via "a Division of Outward Bound." In May 2005, the Outward Bound USA identity would be launched as CREDITS Counsel: Tony Spaeth CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 15/11/2006 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 70% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Low visibility: Memo | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change perceived composition Redefine the defining units | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
Functional driver: 30% | |||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 30% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||