Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Johnson Controls 2007
2007 1974 Professor Warren Johnson founded the company in 1885 to manufacture his invention, the electric room thermostat. Today its newly named "Building Efficiency" business has grown from that seed, while its "Power Solutions" (think batteries) and "Automotive Experience" (think car interiors) businesses have been added. And it is big now, and global (140,000 employees, only 2,500 at the Milwaukee base). But in January 2006, the company was feeling misunderstood and underappreciated... coldly competent, where it sought to be open and approachable; boring, where it sought emotional resonance. Its logo, a wordmark with cascading O's, had been designed in 1974 to express transition from the mechanical to the computer age but now just felt tired... a drag, not a driver. So management retained Lippincott for a brand review. Lippincott's consultants established the brand basics, articulating a corporate brand platform that employees as well as customers could respect, a platform convening and cohering these disparate businesses in commonly understood functional and social purposes and in a shared positioning: "Johnson Controls is the global market leader in integrating technologies, products and services that redefine the relationships between people and their surroundings. Our market insight enables us to anticipate marketplace needs and provide practical, eco-friendly solutions. By understanding the changes that affect how we live, work and travel, we help create smart environments that are more comfortable, efficient, safe, and sustainable." Lippincott's designers then provided a logo (whose wordmark would make "Johnson" the hero rather than "Controls"), featuring a symbol they would call the "open globe." They felt ideas of openness and global reach, and the desired emotional impact, could not be achieved through type alone, thus the symbol. There's a tagline too, "Ingenuity Welcome," in addition to the three unit names (to be communicated as "businesses," never Divisions or Companies). Their purpose is to help redefine the company's industry as well as its parts. The comprehensive visual system features a system of shapes which derive from various products, plus a palette and special typography. The rebranding was first rolled out to employees over six months, in a slow-reveal campaign which began with culture, purpose and positioning messages, building toward the October 1 public launch. CREDITS Lippincott (NY) CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 3/10/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 90% | |||
Change direction Redefine industry or core competence | 5% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting geographic association | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Enhance size perception | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 15% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 5% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Visual endorsement | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Verbal or no endorsement | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Affiliation descriptions | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Visual endorsement | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Verbal or no endorsement | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
Functional driver: 10% | |||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||