Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: FedEx Corporation 2000
2000 1994 2000 brand architecture !n 1994, Federal Express adopted the communicative name and logo "FedEx." (See FedEx 1994 case.) Then in January 1998, Federal Express Corporation acquired Caliber Systems Inc. and its portfolio of shipping and logistics businesses including RPS, a small-package ground service, Roberts Express and several others. A new parent holding company, "FDX Corp," was formed to contain these Caliber businesses as well as the core FedEx Express business, and "Caliber" was discontinued. This 1998 acquisition was in effect the beginning of a two-year rebranding event. Over the next two years, FDX Corp. worked to assimilate these subsidiaries, which had redefined and expanded the scope of FedEx. In January 2000, founding CEO Frederick W. Smith completed the rebranding, using a variety of tools to extend the FedEx brand asset to many more selected units... thus broadening its meaning from "express" to a more comprehensive view of logistical services. "It's time to leverage and extend one of our greatest assets, the FedEx brand, and to provide our customers an integrated set of business solutions," Smith said. The corporate presence itself was renamed, from FDX to FedEx (expressed in purple-gray). Four more defining units were identified (in addition to FedEx Express), renamed descriptively, and color-coded. RPS, for example, became FedEx Ground (purple-green), and Roberts Express became FedEx Custom Critical (purple-blue). The result -- a monolithic signature system with color pallettes used to express service specializations. A perceived product gap was filled with the creation of FedEx Home Delivery, to be provided through the FedEx Ground network. (Several other units such as Viking Freight and Carribean Transportation Services were not rebranded as FedEx, resulting in a mixed signature system, part monolithic and part verbal endorsement.) In addition to product changes and some unit reorganization, a re-alignment of employees was probably the strongest rebranding message. The various rebranded units' sales and support people were consolidated in one new FedEx relationship management team. The rebranding idea of the new FedEx services portfolio was launched with a surge of advertising, but made far more visible by the appearance of trucks with startingly different FedEx colors. CREDITS Landor advised on brand architecture, naming and design (color coding) CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 16/05/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Structural driver: 20% | |||
Merger & Acquisition Transformed survivor brand | 20% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Subsidiaries | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Strategic driver: 80% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Subsidiaries | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Brands & products | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Elevate public profile | 20% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Transfer affiliation from unit to parent | 10% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||
Change perceived composition Redefine the defining units | 20% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Subsidiaries | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Brands & products | ||
Change perceived composition Modify parental 'umbrella' presence | 20% | x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette |
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Formal/legal names | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Principal unit names or competence list | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Mixed | ||
x | Situation facts: Subcorporate facts: Defining units | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Employee behaviour | ||