Featured cases
- ABM Industries 2012
- AkzoNobel 2008
- Alcatel-Lucent 2006
- Alliance Boots 2006
- Apple 2007
- Aramark 1994
- ArcelorMittal 2007
- Assurant 2004
- Bausch & Lomb 2004
- BDO International 2010
- Belgacom 2003
- Boise Cascade 2002
- BP 2000
- Broadview Security 2009
- Brocade 2007
- CA 2005
- Cardinal Health 2003
- CEC Bank 2008
- Chemtura 2005
- Cisco Systems 2006
- Cision 2007
- Computer Associates 2001
- Covidien 2007
- Credit Suisse 2006
- CSC 2008
- Daimler 2007
- Delta Air Lines 2007
- Devon Energy 2007
- DSM 2011
- Eastman Kodak 2006
- EDF 2005
- Experian 2007
- Federal Express 1994
- FedEx Corporation 2000
- FICO 2009
- Fiserv Inc. 2009
- Fortis 1998
- Fortis 2006
- Fortis 1991
- Genworth 2004
- Gillette 1993
- Grant Thornton 2008
- Harcourt General 1993
- Harlan Laboratories 2008
- Hyperion 2006
- Ingersoll Rand 2005
- Intel 2006
- Invista 2003
- Johnson Controls 2007
- Kemper 2011
- Lineage Logistics 2012
- LM Wind Power 2010
- Lucent Technologies 1996
- Marathon Oil Corporation 2011
- Marsh & McLennan Companies 2011
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 2003
- McGladrey 2010
- Meredith Corporation 2009
- MFS Investment Management 2012
- Morgan Stanley 2006
- Nielsen 2007
- Nokia Siemens Networks 2007
- Novartis 1997
- NXP Semiconductors 2006
- Outward Bound USA 2005
- Polycom 2012
- Princeton University Press 2007
- Reliance ADAG 2006
- Rockwell Collins 2006
- Samsung 1993
- Sensata Technologies 2006
- Shipley Energy 2011
- Sistema Telecom 2006
- Smith & Nephew 2003
- Sprint (Sprint Nextel) 2005
- Starbucks 2011
- Tenneco 1995
- Texenergo 2011
- The Joint Commission 2007
- The Paley Center for Media 2007
- The Phoenix Companies 2006
- Thomson Reuters 2008
- Tyco Electronics 2007
- Umicore 2001
- Unilever 2004
- Unum Group 2007
- Vale 2007
- Vantiv 2011
- Velfina 2004
- Wolters Kluwer 2005
- Wyeth Pharmaceuticals 2002
- Xerox 2008
Case: Hyperion 2006
2006 1999 In 1998, Arbor Software merged with Hyperion Solutions and took the Hyperion name, then in 1999 added a logo (designed by Landor) dominated by an H composed of nine bubbly-bright circles. It was at the time a fresh and appropriate brand personality... for a software company seeking awareness. But in just a few years, Hyperion outgrew this personality (employees called it "the Fruit Loops"). Moreover, the symbol still consumed space that made "Hyperion" tiny. A new CEO came on board, and Godfrey Sullivan was determined to broaden the company's definition and to reposition it: "Hyperion Solutions Corporation is the global leader in Business Performance Management software. We strive to be the management system partner for global enterprises." Interbrand was retained to design a new mark, both more functional and more authoritative in personality. A wordmark resulted, linked to a symbol called "the confluence mark," and a tagline added, "The future in sight." Hyperion VP Mike Bell adds: "The “confluence mark” represents the confluence of business intelligence and financial applications – which together form the basis of a Business Performance Management solution. This was the basis for our redesign and Godfrey’s desire to create a new identity that reflects our BPM leadership and vision. We launched in April 2006 at our annual users conference, and with full page ads in NYTimes and WSJ." Tony Spaeth CREDITS Interbrand CASE INFO Submitted by: Tony Spaeth, 27/01/2007 |
MATRIX DATA
DRIVERS | TOOLS | ||
Strategic driver: 80% | |||
Broaden scope/scale/visibility Remove limiting category association | 40% | x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines |
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Change internal culture Enhance pride & confidence | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change internal culture Refresh & redirect competitive energy | 10% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : High visibility: Campaign | ||
Change expressed personality Renew/refresh public image | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Verbal elements: Tag lines | ||
x | Situation facts: Corporate level facts: Industry definition | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||
Functional driver: 20% | |||
Design weakness Increase visual strength/quality | 20% | x | Identifier tactics: Logo change: Symbol-dominant |
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Typography | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Graphic devices | ||
x | Identity system elements: Visual system: Palette | ||
x | Identity system elements: Unit signature system: Monolithic | ||
x | Change event : Medium visibility: Launch event | ||